Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 00:41

Thank you.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Google adds AI features to Chromebook Plus devices - TechCrunch
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
NASA raises the odds that an asteroid could hit the moon in 2032 - Space
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
This Nutrient May Help Lower Your Stroke Risk by 36%, New Study Says - EatingWell
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Fireball streaks through aurora-filled skies photo of the day for June 5, 2025 - Space
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Why do ugly men flirt with girls that are really hot?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What’s next?
Why do Democrats never produce a good argument for why Trump was a bad president?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.